Editorial standards

How PapaTime sources, verifies, and corrects what we publish

Last reviewed · Owner: Slava Nikitin


What this page covers

PapaTime is a small team building a parental-control product. This page documents the standards we hold our public claims to — on this site, in our newsletter, and in any external press we participate in. If you find something on PapaTime that contradicts this page, it’s a bug. Email hello@trypapatime.com and we’ll fix it.

Sourcing claims

Verifying competitor comparisons

The comparison table on the homepage (PapaTime vs Apple Screen Time, Google Family Link, Qustodio) is verified against each vendor’s own current marketing or documentation, not third-party reviews. The table carries an “as of” date and is re-checked at least quarterly. If a competitor ships a feature that invalidates a row, we update the row before the quarterly review.

We don’t describe a competitor’s features in ways their own documentation doesn’t support. If we’ve made a mistake about a competitor’s product, please tell us — we correct factual errors in 48 hours and post the diff in our changelog.

Original data and case studies

PapaTime is in private beta as of May 2026. Any future case studies or aggregated usage statistics will (a) name the cohort size, (b) name the time period, (c) be opt-in for the families involved, and (d) never identify a child by name or photo without written parental consent.

Corrections policy

Conflicts of interest

Privacy and data handling

See the Privacy Policy for how we handle child and parent data. In short: data lives in Google Cloud Firestore (EU regions), we don’t sell or rent it, analytics use Plausible (cookieless), and children’s personally identifiable information is minimized to first name and chore activity only.

Who to contact

hello@trypapatime.com reaches the founder directly. Subject lines starting with [CORRECTION] are routed to the top of the queue.

Back to home